翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Kent Television
・ Kent Theater
・ Kent Tong
・ Kent Top Travel
・ Kent Town, South Australia
・ Kent Township
・ Kent Township, Stephenson County, Illinois
・ Kent Township, Warren County, Indiana
・ Kent Trails
・ Kent Tritle
・ Kent TV
・ Kent Twitchell
・ Kent Tønnesen
・ Kent University
・ Kent v Griffiths
Kent v Kavanagh
・ Kent v. Dulles
・ Kent V. Flannery
・ Kent Vosler
・ Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury
・ Kent W. Colton
・ Kent Walton
・ Kent Warner
・ Kent Warner Smith
・ Kent Warnock
・ Kent Weigle
・ Kent Wells
・ Kent West
・ Kent West (European Parliament constituency)
・ Kent West (provincial electoral district)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Kent v Kavanagh : ウィキペディア英語版
Kent v Kavanagh

''Kent v Kavanagh'' () (EWCA Civ 162 ) is an English land law case, concerning easements.
==Facts==
Constructed in 1907, numbers 56 and 58 in a semi detached housing estate were built with a path between them, giving access from a road to the back gardens. The boundary between the two was the mid line of the path. On 14 May 1976 the estate owners sold number 56 to the tenants under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 section 8 to give effect to the tenants’ rights to enfranchisement. The tenants had not required an express right of way be included under LRA 1967 section 10(3)(a). On October 1976 the estate owners sold number 58 to that house’s tenants. In 2003, the occupants of number 56 sued number 58 for a right of way.
The Judge rejected the claim that the right appertained to number 56 under LPA 1925 s 62(2) because there was no evidence the path was used for gaining access to the back garden at the time of the conveyance. But he accepted an easement over the path should be implied into the 14 May 1976 conveyance under ''Wheeldon v Burrows'' because it was necessary for reasonable enjoyment.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Kent v Kavanagh」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.